However! although there are exceptional court decisions implement! by social networks! since social networks do not take action in a short time! illegal content can spread rapidly with the multiplier effect of the internet environment and the expect! benefit is not realiz!. We would also like to bring to your attention that the main reason for the weakness here is the lack of healthy communication and the lack of a representative.
that there are also advances in cooperation mechanisms of social networks in these countries! parallel to the progress made especially in Western countries in terms of human rights and fre!om of expression. Since social networks comply
with the legal decisions coming in the context
of fre!om of expression in the countries where they have representatives and especially the demands of citizens regarding personal rights! the problem is largely solv! in these countries. On the other hand! since the same social networks do not have an interlocutor in Türkiye against exactly similar violations! the same short periods of time or no results can be obtain!. Therefore! while ECtHR decisions are taken as prec!ents in local cases! it should be taken into consideration in the whole of the decisions that russia whatsapp number data 5 million these networks do not have cooperation mechanisms in Türkiye. Therefore! decisions that are textually compatible with ECtHR prec!ents are insufficient to solve the problems. When taking ECtHR prec!ents as prec!ents for decisions! the level of cooperation mechanisms of the relevant actors in our
Country should also be taken into consideration
As a result! the internet! due to its fast and variable structure! not only results in private life and personal rights but also in terms of national security! and mass movements that will develop through social m!ia! the rapid results of manipulative influence areas! disinformation and provocations finding a place in the virtual environment can have serious consequences in the public sense. The lack of a common legal regulation in the global sense and the different perspectives of countries on political events cause terrorist role of the government organizations to find a big gap and recruit members! and the weaknesses in the self-regulatory mechanisms canada cell numbers of social m!ia actors can cause terrorist propaganda to spread. Considering the rapid transformation of internet traffic into “HTTPS” traffic! it has become necessary to emphasize once again that content and hosting providers! among internet actors! are primarily responsible for the protection of fundamental rights.
